Track A · Case Study · Publishing Rights & Catalogue Ownership

The Beatles & "Yesterday"The most expensive publishing mistake in music history, and what it teaches us about owning your rights

"Yesterday" is the most covered song in recorded history, with over 2,200 versions. And for more than 50 years, Paul McCartney could not collect a single dollar of publishing revenue from his own masterpiece. This is the story of how that happened, and the revenue ecosystem it left behind.

2,200+
Cover Versions
54 Years
Without Full Publishing
$1.5B+
2024 Catalogue Value
The Story — How It All Went Wrong

"Yesterday" by The Beatles is the most covered song in recorded history with over 2,200 versions. Written by Paul McCartney in 1965, it is one of the most valuable pieces of intellectual property ever created. And yet for over 50 years, McCartney could not collect a single dollar of publishing revenue from his own masterpiece.

Understanding why requires understanding one of the most important and cautionary stories in the entire history of the music industry, a story that begins not with a bad guy, but with a bad contract signed by very young men who didn't know what they were giving away.

The key lesson: The Beatles were 20-year-old working class musicians from Liverpool who trusted their manager to make the right deal. They had no idea what they were signing away.

1963 — Northern Songs Is Born

When The Beatles began their meteoric rise, their manager Brian Epstein arranged a publishing deal with music publisher Dick James. The result was a company called Northern Songs Ltd., formed specifically to own and administer the publishing rights to Lennon and McCartney compositions.

Dick James · 50%
Brian Epstein · 10%
John Lennon · 20%
Paul McCartney · 20%

Dick James

50% ownership. Wrote none of the music. Owned more than both Beatles combined, and crucially held just enough to always outvote everyone else.

Brian Epstein

10% ownership. The manager who arranged the deal on behalf of the band.

John Lennon

20% ownership. Co-writer of the most valuable song catalog in history.

Paul McCartney

20% ownership. Together with Lennon, owned only 40% of their own songs.

1965–2017 — From Public Offering to Settlement

Northern Songs was listed on the London Stock Exchange, which further diluted the Beatles' ownership. Lennon and McCartney's stakes dropped to approximately 15% each. Brian Epstein died suddenly in 1967, and Dick James quietly sold his majority stake to ATV Music without informing the Beatles first. McCartney reportedly learned about the sale through a newspaper.

1963
Northern Songs formed
1969
ATV takes control
1985
Jackson buys for $47.5M
1995
Sony/ATV joint venture
2016
Sony buys for $750M
2017
McCartney partially reclaims

In 1985, Michael Jackson purchased the ATV catalog, including 251 Beatles songs, for $47.5 million, famously having been shown by McCartney himself how valuable publishing income could be. A decade later, Jackson sold 50% of ATV to Sony, and in 2016 Sony bought the remaining 50% from the Jackson estate for $750 million. In 2017, McCartney sued Sony/ATV under the US Copyright Act's 35-year reversion provision, regaining control of many of his Beatles songs in the US market, though UK rights remained more complex.

The Revenue Ecosystem — Where Every Dollar Goes

Every song has two separate copyrights. The master recording is owned by the label. The composition (melody and lyrics) is owned by the publisher. Both must be licensed separately for every use.

The Master Recording

Sound Recording

+

The Composition

Publishing Rights

Publishing revenue splits into two equal halves, the Writer's Share and the Publisher's Share. Here is exactly what McCartney lost when he lost his publishing rights:

Writer's Share · 50%
Publisher's Share · 50%

McCartney always received his writer's 50%. What he lost was the publisher's 50%, which for one of the most performed songs in history represents tens of millions of dollars.

Revenue Breakdown by Income Stream

These figures are illustrative based on industry-standard splits.

Revenue TypeLabel / MasterArtist / PerformerPublisherSongwriter
Streaming (e.g. Spotify)~46%~10%~2.4%~9.5%
Radio / Broadcastvia SoundExchange50% of publishing each
Sync License (Film/TV/Ad)negotiatednegotiated %negotiated %
Cover Versions (Mechanical)via publishervia publisher
Physical Sales (CD/Vinyl)~50%~15–25%~10–15%~8–12%

With 2,200+ cover versions, heavy radio airplay, constant placements, and billions of streams, the publisher's share alone has been worth hundreds of millions of dollars over the song's lifetime.

The Catalogue Math — Investment of the Century
$47.5M
1985
$95M
1995
$750M
2016
$1.5B+
2024
TransactionYearAmountWhat Changed Hands
Jackson purchases ATV catalog1985$47.5M251 Beatles songs + 4,000 others
Jackson sells 50% to Sony1995$95M50% stake, Sony/ATV formed
Sony buys Jackson estate's 50%2016$750MFull ownership transferred to Sony
Beatles catalog estimated value2024$1.5B+Publishing rights to 251 songs

Total return on Jackson's original $47.5M investment: ~3,000%, one of the greatest IP investments in history.

McCartney taught Jackson the value of owning publishing rights. Jackson took that advice, bought McCartney's own songs, and turned $47.5 million into $1.5 billion. The lesson isn't that Jackson was wrong, it's that McCartney should never have lost his rights in the first place.

✓ What McCartney Always Kept

  • His writer's share (50% of publishing income)
  • Credit as composer on all recordings
  • Performance royalties via his PRO
  • Moral rights in UK copyright law
  • US rights reclaimed in 2017 settlement

✗ What McCartney Lost for 54 Years

  • Publisher's share (50% of all publishing income)
  • Control over sync licensing decisions
  • Ability to prevent commercial use of songs
  • Revenue from 2,200+ cover versions
  • UK publishing rights (still complex)

Listen along: Hear "Yesterday" and the covers referenced throughout this case study on Spotify.

Key Terms
Publishing Rights
The ownership of the underlying composition (melody and lyrics) of a song, separate from the master recording. The publisher collects income whenever the composition is used.
Writer's Share
50% of all publishing income that is paid directly to the songwriter regardless of who owns the publishing. McCartney always received this.
Publisher's Share
The other 50% of publishing income, collected by whoever owns the publishing rights. This is what McCartney lost for 54 years.
Music Catalogue
A collection of song copyrights owned or administered by a publisher. Catalogues are bought and sold as investment assets, the Beatles catalogue was worth $1.5B+ by 2024.
Copyright Reversion
A US law provision (35-year rule) allowing songwriters to reclaim publishing rights from publishers after 35 years. McCartney used this to begin recovering his catalogue in 2017.
Sync License
Permission to use a song in audiovisual content. Because Jackson owned the publishing, he could license Beatles songs to commercials, something McCartney vigorously opposed.
Questions
1
McCartney and Lennon signed their publishing deal in 1963 when they were young and inexperienced. What could they have done differently, and what does this tell us about the importance of legal counsel for artists?
2
Michael Jackson used McCartney's own advice to buy his songs. Was Jackson's move ethical? Was it good business? Can something be both ethically questionable and legally sound?
3
Jackson licensed Beatles songs to television commercials, something McCartney strongly opposed. As the publisher, Jackson had the legal right to do this. What does this tell us about the relationship between ownership, artistic control, and creative legacy?
4
The Beatles catalogue went from $47.5M (1985) to $1.5B+ (2024). What does this tell us about the long-term value of music publishing rights compared to other investments?
5
If you were advising a young songwriter today, what three things would you tell them based on the Beatles' story?